[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Roger Costello: My Version of "Why use OWL?"
Simon St.Laurent wrote: > > Wow. This is where I really have to wonder if OWL is Karl Popper's > revenge on the world, a naive view of useful information as a collection > of facts, "objective knowledge". Revenge? Is this a problem? :-) Indeed it is common practice to informally refer to a particular collection of triples as a "knowledge base" > > Oh well. Too far from markup - can we talk about elements and > attributes again? > I expect that any statement that is strictly limited to elements and attributes has already been made, or else is a rehash of another statement that has already been made, probably originating in the XML 1.0 rec itself modulo some issues with what really is UNICODE etc... Jonathan
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|