[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: schema to require than an element have *no* text

• To: Ray Tayek <rtayek@a...>
• Subject: Re: schema to require than an element have *no* text
• From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)
• Date: 22 Apr 2003 14:34:44 +0100
• Cc: xml-dev@l..., Jeff Lowery <Jeff.Lowery@c...>
• In-reply-to: <5.2.0.9.2.20030416205531.0205a990@m...>
• References: <4827EC373E03DB44AC2AB3900430896B026689@c.... com><5.2.0.9.2.20030416205531.0205a990@m...>
• Sender: ht@i...
• User-agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Portable Code)

Ray Tayek <rtayek@a...> writes:

> At 11:41 PM 4/7/03 -0700, you wrote:
> >At 02:48 PM 4/7/03 -0700, Jeff Lowery wrote:
> >>The schema you have looks sufficient.  Unless you have content="mixed" in
> >>the complexType definitions, it won't allow text nodes in the element.
> >
> >oh, great! looks like i did the right thing by accident :)
> 
> or almost. using the .xsd and .xml files below (the same as before i
> think) which has  no content="mixed" in it, with a hacked up version
> of the traverse program from harold's book, i get stuff like:  "
> \n\t\t\t" i.e. space, line-feed, and some tabs (see just below).
> 
> 
> looks like the pretty printing is getting me. but the xml file
> validates against the schema (using xmlspy).

Not sure what your question is, but XMLSpy is correct here -- W3C XML
Schema, as XML 1.0 DTDs, allows whitespace between the elements
governed by an element-only content model.

ht
-- 
  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                      Half-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@c...
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
 [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: schema to require than an element have *no* text
    • From: Ray Tayek <rtayek@a...>

• References:
  • RE: schema to require than an element have *no* text
    • From: Ray Tayek <rtayek@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: PSVI Question
• Next by Date: Re: Syntax vs semantics
• Previous by thread: RE: schema to require than an element have *no* text
• Next by thread: Re: schema to require than an element have *no* text
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread