[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XML's Scylla and Charybdis - parse and regexp
miles@m... (Miles Sabin) writes: >I think we're back in floor-wax/dessert-topping territory. One of the >early gripes with the DOM was browser/editor-specific functionality >imposing significant performance overheads (in terms of the maintenance >of book-keeping data) on server-side applications of the DOM. From my >POV the result was much too browser/editor-centric. Fair enough. Perhaps there's a case to be made that the real flaw lay with people (including myself at one point) who expected the DOM to provide the API for XML, rather than being one possibility of many. I seem to remember there even being concerns that SAX was treading on W3C and DOM territory, though I think Jon Bosak made it clear that it wasn't a problem. >I don't really remember much of these discussions revolving around the >preservation or otherwise of lexical information, I think the scylla/charybdis assumptions set in pretty early. -- Simon St.Laurent Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets Errors, errors, all fall down! http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|