[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: If XML is too hard for a programmer, perhaps he'd b e
> That the application is dumb to expect exclusively text, with no > provision for markup. OK > >Even more importantly, do you *really* want your <b></b> tags to be > >hanging out with no namespace? What will you do when your "markup" > >contains something like "<p><br>"? > > Well, actually, that's precisely how we write the stories on > xmlhack.com, and there's this little bit of code that checks your markup > for well-formedness when you enter it. This isn't rocket science. On the one hand you have no problem using some hackish version of HTML that is neither XHTML nor HTML 4.0; yet you consider it an unacceptable hack to use CDATA. This is the irony that puzzled me at first. I suppose I understand why you are doing it, though, and agree that tools do a bad job of supporting scenarios where you want to enter the raw markup directly (rather than text). On the other hand, *some* tools aren't even smart enough to escape markup symbols that creep into text fields, and that's even more annoying.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|