|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Registered Namespace prefixes
> I still don't see the point. Fair 'nuff. > I don't give a tinker's cuss if someone has registered "foo" > as a prefix, only > that when I see foo:bar, I know it really means "a purchase > order". And that's not the problem I'm trying to solve. My aim is more modest in function, if not impact: to eliminate namespace prefix declarations in documents, and thereby eliminate namespace scope and namespace forwarding issues. To accomplish this, it seeks to make the prefix + local name the one and only true universal name, through the mechanism of a vetted registry. The prefix + local name become a bound, inseparable entity when parsed. Does it make the meaning of that universal name unique? No. People could still write schemas and such that associate different definitions to the same universal name. That is still a problem, but a debatable one. "He said he'll murder the murder of crows that crows outside his bedroom window each morning" uses different identifiers to mean different things. Which thing it means depends on context. Is it really desirable to have a single set of associations, maintained officially, for each universal name? What about names associated with wildcard declarations?: Can they possibly 'mean' just one thing? I wasn't trying to address those questions... too deep for me.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








