[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: XML too hard for programmers?

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: XML too hard for programmers?
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 09:48:39 -0500
• In-reply-to: <B885BEDCB3664E4AB1C72F1D85CB29F804B7C9D8@R...>

dareo@m... (Dare Obasanjo) writes:
>As for Micah's post, I'm not sure what his conclusion has to do with 
>Tim's post. All we need is xml:id and everything will be OK? Huh? 

Did you read to the end of it?

"This isn't the only thing that could make XML more pleasant (there is,
for example, Tom Bradford's Clean Namespaces proposal), but definately
in the top 15."

It might be interesting to see what a complete 15 would look like.


-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org

• References:
  • RE: XML too hard for programmers?
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML too hard for programmers?
• Next by Date: RE: XML too hard for programmers?
• Previous by thread: RE: XML too hard for programmers?
• Next by thread: RE: XML too hard for programmers?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread