[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: mischief

• To: "'xml-dev@l...'" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: mischief
• From: "Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@p...>
• Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 11:19:30 -0800

http://plant.blogger.com/api/sample_getTemplateResponse.xml looks reasonable
to me -- especially in the light of
http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2003/02/26/binaryxml.html which points out that all
data is XML, even 36 megabyte TIFF files.

Ok, maybe they should have closed the <BR> tags.

Leigh.

-----Original Message-----
From: bryan [mailto:bry@i...] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 12:55 AM
To: 'Simon St.Laurent'
Cc: xml-dev@l...
Subject: RE:  mischief



>Out of rough legibility, lots of tools, and a horribly mangled set of
>philosophies, we're getting a huge selection of document vocabularies
>created by people who obviously don't give a damn about markup.  

It's probably not nice, and it may in fact be injurious to one's health,
but check the following documents:

http://plant.blogger.com/api/sample_getTemplateResponse.xml
http://static.userland.com/gems/scriptingNews/template.opml

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: mischief
    • From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...>

• Prev by Date: XQuery
• Next by Date: Re: mischief
• Previous by thread: XQuery
• Next by thread: Re: mischief
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread