[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Registered namespace prefixes
james.anderson@s... (james anderson) writes: > [...many excellent examples snipped...] > >the same situation applies to universal names, "scoped namespaces", >bound prefixes, and etc. it would be more productive to identify the >inadequacies in the representations used to model them than to try to >trace representational artifacts back to the semantics of namespaces. While I agree with you that there really is no "ideal text", I have a very hard time finding that a justification for the entirely new burdens that Namespaces in XML created. It makes me laugh and cry that I should have to read through all of the attributes of a given element just to figure out what the properly-constructed name of that element is. The complicating factors that XML 1.0 itself introduced - default attributes and entities - at least didn't involve that kind of jumping back and forth. Namespace semantics are a bad joke. Let's stop pretending they ever existed, since no one has ever been able to explain what they are. Labels without built-in semantics appears to be as far as we've ever gotten, and that's hardly worth the representational hassle. -- Simon St.Laurent Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets Errors, errors, all fall down! http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|