[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XPointer goes to REC

• To: todd glassey <todd.glassey@w...>
• Subject: Re: XPointer goes to REC
• From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@b...>
• Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 10:46:54 -0500
• Cc: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>, xml-dev@l...
• Organization: BAH
• References: <20030325150453.GF30866@s...> <008d01c2f2e4$47ec29c0$020aff0a@tsg1>

<Quote>
Most people would tell you that XML.ORG has no say as to what others do
with its standards, and that is pure BS. 
</Quote>

Hmmm...interesting discourse. But I'm not sure what you mean when you
refer to "XML.org standards"; do you perhaps mean OASIS?

Kind Regards,
Joe Chiusano
Booz | Allen | Hamilton

todd glassey wrote:
> 
> Is there an XML.ORG policy on allowing its non-standards documents to be
> referenced by any others body???
> 
> Most people would tell you that XML.ORG has no say as to what others do with
> its standards, and that is pure BS. The actuality is that if XML.ORG was to
> publish a statement that its Intellectual Properties could not be referenced
> by other standards as part of their processes until they make standards
> status within XML.ORG - that this problem would not be happening.
> 
> The people who will object to this will all have financial dependence on
> getting their products to market and that's why they have pushed the W3C
> into backing processes and declarations that have not yet reached maturity -
> This further says that W3C is politically motivated and is not a true
> standards body but one where commercial interests of the insiders are put
> ahead of the standards process -
> 
> It doesn't matter whether you agree with the above or not - that one person
> says this publicly is all that it takes to invalidate the envelope of
> propriety around the W3C's operations and make the motivations behind all
> their efforts suspect. And considering what's what - this is a real issue I
> think.
> 
> Todd Glassey
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Cowan" <jcowan@r...>
> To: <xml-dev@l...>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 7:04 AM
> Subject:  XPointer goes to REC
> 
> > I have just heard that the XPointer Framework and the element() and
> xmlns()
> > schemes have become W3C Recommendations.  The xpointer() scheme is still
> > at WD stage.
> >
> > --
> > A poetical purist named Cowan           [that's me:
> jcowan@r...]
> > Once put the rest of us dowan.          [on xml-dev]
> >     "Your verse would be sweeter        http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
> >     If it only had metre                http://www.reutershealth.com
> > And rhymes that didn't force me to frowan."     [overpacked
> line!] --Michael Kay
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> > initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
> >
> > The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> > manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>
> >
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
> initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>
> 
> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>

begin:vcard 
n:Chiusano;Joseph
tel;work:(703) 902-6923
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:www.bah.com
org:Booz | Allen | Hamilton;IT Digital Strategies Team
adr:;;8283 Greensboro Drive;McLean;VA;22012;
version:2.1
email;internet:chiusano_joseph@b...
title:Senior Consultant
fn:Joseph M. Chiusano
end:vcard

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XPointer goes to REC
    • From: "todd glassey" <todd.glassey@w...>

• References:
  • XPointer goes to REC
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
  • Re: XPointer goes to REC
    • From: "todd glassey" <todd.glassey@w...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XPointer goes to REC
• Next by Date: Re: XPointer goes to REC
• Previous by thread: Re: XPointer goes to REC
• Next by thread: Re: XPointer goes to REC
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread