[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XML too hard for programmers?

• To: Dare Obasanjo <dareo@m...>
• Subject: Re: XML too hard for programmers?
• From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@r...>
• Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 03:48:52 -0500
• Cc: Chet Murthy <chet@w...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <B885BEDCB3664E4AB1C72F1D85CB29F805C1F72D@R...>; from dareo@m... on Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 09:52:44PM -0800
• References: <B885BEDCB3664E4AB1C72F1D85CB29F805C1F72D@R...>
• Reply-to: veillard@r...
• User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i

On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 09:52:44PM -0800, Dare Obasanjo wrote:
> Tim is basically asking for pull-based XML parsers, implementations of
[...]
> and its C# equivalent which has been available in the .NET Framework for
> over a year
[...]
> His Perl + pseudocode is more verbose than the actual C# code but the
> functionality he claims to want is right there and terseness isn't
> really a place where C# can compete with Perl anyway.  

  libxml2 (version >= 2.5.0) also provide an xml reader interface:
     http://xmlsoft.org/xmlreader.html

The resulting Python code would be very similar to yours.

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard@r...  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/

• References:
  • RE: XML too hard for programmers?
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Problem with Key element in xml schema
• Next by Date: Re: An approach to let XML 2.n resources hold multiple entities
• Previous by thread: Hiding xsl
• Next by thread: RE: XML too hard for programmers?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread