[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Transactional Integrity of Services (SHORT)
Walter, You make great points regarding semantics. I would recommend that you track the progress of DAML-S [1], an emerging DAML+OIL ontology for Semantic Web Services. Quotes from [1]: DAML-S is an emerging DAML+OIL ontology for Semantic Web Services. It is a collaborative effort between BBN Technologies, Carnegie Mellon University, Nokia Research Center, SRI International, Stanford University, and Yale University. The Semantic Web is rapidly becoming a reality through the development of Semantic Web markup languages such as DAML+OIL, and these markup languages enable the creation of arbitrary domain ontologies (such as DAML-S) that support the unambiguous description of Web content. While WSDL provides a low-level description of Web services, DAML-S complements WSDL by providing Web service descriptions at the application layer - that is, describing what a service can do, not just how it does it. A DAML-S/WSDL binding (known as a "grounding") has been defined that involves a complementary use of the two languages. Kind Regards, Joe Chiusano Booz | Allen | Hamilton [1] http://www.icsi.berkeley.edu/~snarayan/ISWC2002.pdf "W. E. Perry" wrote: > > Chiusano Joseph wrote: > > > Tangentially related to this discussion: > > > > SOAP 1.2 Message Normalization became a W3C Note [1] on 3/28/03. From > > the abstract: > > > > "SOAP 1.2 intermediaries have some license when reserializing messages that > > pass through them. This document defines a transformation algorithm that > > renders all semantically equivalent SOAP messages identically. The > > transformation may be used in conjunction with an XML canonicalization > > algorithm prior to the generation of a message digest in producing XML digital > > signatures that are sufficiently robust to survive passage through one or more > > SOAP intermediaries." > > Arrrgh. From my original point to its polar opposite in six steps (quite a > tangency!). Would anyone care to give a declarative definition of semantic > equivalence in the general case? Can that be done except, as here, by > prescribing canonical processes in order to constrain their potential outcomes? > But isn't that the centrally-controlled converse of what we hope for from web > [nocap] services? Isn't the point of WS to offer best-of-breed expert > functionality in all of its exquisite idiosyncrasy so that its uncompromised > power can be harnessed into customized workflows? But if the processes are > canonical to such a degree that we can speak of their outcomes as semantically > equivalent, what's the point of using a web-available process rather than > building your own and avoiding all the problems of security and of semantic > mismatches? > > Respectfully, > > Walter Perry > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an > initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> > > The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ > > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription > manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl> begin:vcard n:Chiusano;Joseph tel;work:(703) 902-6923 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:www.bah.com org:Booz | Allen | Hamilton;IT Digital Strategies Team adr:;;8283 Greensboro Drive;McLean;VA;22012; version:2.1 email;internet:chiusano_joseph@b... title:Senior Consultant fn:Joseph M. Chiusano end:vcard
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|