[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: New release of W3C XML Schema errata, preparatory to 2nd edition

• To: daniel@v...
• Subject: Re: New release of W3C XML Schema errata, preparatory to 2nd edition
• From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)
• Date: 28 Feb 2003 11:15:54 +0000
• Cc: xmlschema-dev@w..., xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <20030227173118.A4336@d...>
• References: <f5bwujmoo4j.fsf@e...><20030227173118.A4336@d...>
• Sender: ht@i...
• User-agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Portable Code)

Daniel Veillard <daniel@v...> writes:

> On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 07:09:16PM +0000, Henry S. Thompson wrote:
> > 
> > Following decisions by the W3C XML Schema Working Group, a number of
> > new errata for the W3C XML Schema Recommendation are now available [1],
> > and the changes mandated by several of them to the schema document for
> > schemas have been applied to its public independent incarnation [2].
> 
>   I don't see anything about the xpath pattern problem I raised publicly
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2002AprJun/0004.html
> 
>  and which was achnoledged as a bug
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2002AprJun/0005.html

We have not gotten to all the known bugs, by any means.  Since that
one means we accept too much, not too little, I don't think this one
was considered urgent.

ht
-- 
  Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                      Half-time member of W3C Team
     2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
	    Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@c...
		     URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
 [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]

• References:
  • New release of W3C XML Schema errata, preparatory to 2nd edition
    • From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)

• Prev by Date: Re: Unicode With Angle Brackets
• Next by Date: Re: Sorting out what we agree and disagree on (was Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????)
• Previous by thread: Re: New release of W3C XML Schema errata, preparatory to 2nd edition
• Next by thread: XML for the Restaurant Industry
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread