[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: SGML->XML->? (was Re: SML: Second Try)
Simon > > I have to admit that XML 1.0, flaws and all, makes me feel > all warm and > fuzzy compared to the specifications that have followed. It wasn't > perfect, but I suspect it's by far the least dysfunctional of the XML > family of specs. I think back on all the permathreads on this list, and look at all the spanking new and ever more complex recommendations and working drafts, and I can't help but develop a mental image of a very smart and very busy swarm of bees buzzing around in ever tighter more vicious circles. Sooner, rather than later, a colony is going to break off and establish themselves, and then there will be two hives to contend with. It seems that no matter how intelligent and qualified and hard-working the people involved in planning future directions are, Chaos is alway sticking its nose in their business and messing their plans. And lately I've come to accept that not only that the way it Is, but perhaps, even, that that's the way it Should Be.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|