[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: The subsetting has begun
XML infosets are already wide spread and will become even moreso in the coming years. That is enough reason to have a data model that is somewhat bound to the XML 1.0 syntax. However as many proposals for alternate syntaxes for XML (including binary ones) have shown this doesn't mean that XML infosets necessarily have to be UnicodeWithAngleBrackets. -- PITHY WORDS OF WISDOM A bank is where they lend you an umbrella and then ask for it back when it begins to rain. This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jeff Lowery [mailto:Jeff.Lowery@c...] > Sent: Monday, February 24, 2003 2:24 PM > To: Dare Obasanjo; Bullard, Claude L (Len); xml-dev@l... > > > Future versions of XML that don't make the infoset a first class > > consideration are refusing to learn from history. For many > people who > > use XML, the syntax is incidental but the data model is not. > > If you want to build upon a data model for data interchange, > why use one that's so obviously closely bound to one > particular syntax? Certainly, one could do better than the > Infoset when defining such a model. > >
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|