[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: SML: Second Try
>And, strictly speaking, we *do* still have only SGML. An enhanced and extended SGML with a well-designed canonical minimal profile, to be sure, but still just SGML. <religiousRightousness>Exactly.. and a big part of the problem. XML was supposed to simply be a human and machine readable markup language where anyone can define the tags, but the SGML people drove hard to get all their baggage into the XML specification (for backwards compatibility). Many of these "trade-offs" I have seen discussed here is because of all that baggage (IMNSHO). </religiousRightousness> I am looking to make XML, with a set of rules to define structure, a way to move out of the dark ages of programming. Web Services, if done correctly, may make this possible. Wouldn't it be nice to not have to always be fixing your code when someone wants to extend something you didn't need in the first place? It's all about interoperability. my 2 cents Owen
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|