[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services
We're talking specifications for standard technology here, not innovations for new technology. If one considers SOAP innovative, there is an impedance mismatch to the specification they are applying. The main argument for the subset is the perceived danger of subsets growing in the wild. Whether or not this is a real or an imagined danger has not yet been established. If this danger is real, I expect the subset to be something close to what TB has described in the SW plus something to accomodate the know id problem, eg, extending the xml: reserved namespace. And the death of DTDs. I suspect the real angst starts there. len -----Original Message----- From: Mike Champion [mailto:mc@x...] <religious-analogy-beaten-into-the-ground> IMHO, It's time for ecumenicalism, not fundamentalism ... time to welcome innovators into the mainstream rather than driving them out as heretics ... time to accept the fact that XML is continually evolving from what survives in the real world, not invented by an omniscient Creator. </religious-analogy-beaten-into-the- ground>
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|