[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services
> On Sun, 2 Feb 2003, Uche Ogbuji wrote: > > > [WS folks] chose XML, and they have > > concommitantly also chosen to " violate the fundamental design of XML". It's > > that simple. > > And what parts of the fundamental design are being violated? DTD's? > > It seems to me that saying WS don't use DTD's and in exchange network > messages can now be manipulated with the same tools as the rest of > the XML toolbox is a pretty cool thing. It's an excellent tradeoff > to avoid a return to IIOP RMI etc. I didn't say anything about whether or not it's an excellent tradeoff for WS folks. I have several times said that I am not interested in that subthread. But yes, rejecting XML documents that use DTD is a violation of XML's fundamental design. Or do you claim that DTDs are not a part of XML's fundamental design? -- Uche Ogbuji Fourthought, Inc. http://uche.ogbuji.net http://4Suite.org http://fourthought.com The open office file format - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-think15/ Python Generators + DOM - http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2003/01/08/py-xml.html 4Suite Repository Features - https://www6.software.ibm.com/reg/devworks/dw-x4suite5-i/ XML class warfare - http://www.adtmag.com/article.asp?id=6965
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|