[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????


Re:  Parsing efficiency? - why not 'compile'????

> Karl Waclawek wrote:
> > Now, given that, the question becomes: What are the advantages?
> > - Efficiency of size?
> > - Speed of parsing?
> 
> A quick list of typical requirements is at:
> 
>    http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/200302/msg00142.html
> 
> > Do they matter? Not in most apps, but probably in some.
> 
> Yes, it doesn't matter much to a great number of apps (which ought to simply 
> ignore it) but it is vital for some classes of applications.

I like the point made about random access. Sort of like an indexed
version of an XML document.

I don't quite understand how binXML gives you better streaming,
in the sense of sending fragments. Isn't that done on the application
level?

Karl


PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.