[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: SGML->XML->? (was Re: SML: Second Try)
I believe it would look like Tim Bray's XML-SW. len From: Dave Pawson [mailto:dpawson@n...] At 11:22 06/02/2003 -0800, Jeff Lowery wrote: > > So would the XML community be okay with defining a subset of XML? > >1. Nobody agrees on what the subset is I think it would make an interesting conversation if the original gang of ?? (less than 10??) sat down again today, and defined *sgml for the web*, with 20-20 hindsight. I wonder how todays version would vary from XML as we know it?
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|