[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: SkunkLink: a skunkworks XML linking proposal
Hi Len, >Do you have a comfort >level for having done that or do you think that >simplification (eg, just two common attributes) >will support growth? For general-purpose XML linking, I don't think anyone has a comfort level for what works and what doesn't, otherwise, this discussion wouldn't be necessary. :-) The goal of picking only two attributes is to get the thing off the ground. Adding all the whiz-bang features in SkunkLink 2.0 or some application-specific language would certainly take several more attributes (and not necessarily in the xml:namespace, as mentioned in the Q & A section) Growth of standards is achieved through momentum. The situation where everybody is sick to death of even talking about a subject is a terrible way to make progress. SkunkLink aims to change that. Thanks, .micah
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|