[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services

• Subject: Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services
• From: "Bill Kearney" <wkearney@i...>
• Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 19:07:56 -0500
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• References: <003801c2c946$e5b34520$6401a8c0@cavnarjohnson>
• Reply-to: "Bill Kearney" <wkearney@i...>

Yeah just like e-mail is a risk.

Which is, of course, what SOAP works over more than just HTTP.  ;-p

This is old bits.  There's nothing new here... move along...

Is it me or are is the tech press off on a "what can we bash this week" binge?



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Cavnar-Johnson, John" <JCavnar-Johnson@s...>
To: "'Rich Salz'" <rsalz@d...>
Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 11:36 AM
Subject: RE:  Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services


> Probably something along these lines:
> http://www.counterpane.com/crypto-gram-0006.html
> 
> The basic idea is that SOAP is an attempt to sneak past the corporate
> firewall and get some real work done, which, of course, is a security
> problem.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Rich Salz [mailto:rsalz@d...]
> > Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 10:28 AM
> > To: elharo@m...
> > Cc: xml-dev@l...
> > Subject: Re:  Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services
> > 
> > > ERH has a thought provoking comment on his weblog today
> > > http://www.ibiblio.org/xml/
> > > The security community detests SOAP/XML-RPC/Web Services because
> they
> > > violate fundamental network security principles.
> > 
> > Hunh?  I'd like to know the basis for this claim.
> > /r$

• References:
  • RE: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services
    • From: "Cavnar-Johnson, John" <JCavnar-Johnson@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: malfunctioning, evil adult as XML
• Next by Date: Re: malfunctioning, evil adult as XML
• Previous by thread: RE: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services
• Next by thread: Re: Elliotte Rusty Harold on Web Services
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread