[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Roles and functions [was: many-to-many]

• To: XML DEV <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Roles and functions [was: many-to-many]
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 17:35:57 -0500
• In-reply-to: <200301302216.RAA23604@m...>

jcowan@r... (John Cowan) writes:
>If you do not know the encoding or format of bits, then you have no
>method other than cryptanalysis for determining their content.

I guess that I do a lot more cryptanalysis than I would normally own up
to, then, though I've spent most of my computing time analysing bytes
rather than individual bits.  I suppose you're counting byte order and
endianness as metadata, but those aren't too hard to sort out for
various common forms of data, even when corrupted.

I think perhaps you're taking the day-to-day work of taking information
about which not everything is known and using it and recasting that as
some kind of far more complex process.  Perhaps it is difficult, but I
hardly thought Walter was talking rocket science.

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org

• References:
  • Re: Roles and functions [was: many-to-many]
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Roles and functions [was: many-to-many]
• Next by Date: XincaML
• Previous by thread: Re: Roles and functions [was: many-to-many]
• Next by thread: Re: many-to-many
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread