[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: bohemians, gentry
Norman Walsh wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > / Paul Prescod was heard to say: > | Is there a conformance level of either XQuery or XPath that allows one > | to avoid the implementation of XML Schema datatypes altogether? > > I think that's still the subject of discussion within the WGs. > > There would clearly be some "ease-of-implementation" value in > providing such a level. (And it would probably satisfy the folks who > want XSLT 2.0 with XPath 1.0.) > > But would it be different, in practice, from using a datatype-capable > processor to process well-formed XML with no schema using a stylesheet > that didn't use any type constructs? Perhaps it would only be different in practice if the requirement to implement schema handling discouraged implementation of XPath and XSLT. Paul Prescod
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|