[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: more QName madness
rsalz@d... (Rich Salz) writes: >Me? I'm not trying to throw out anything. I'm trying to understand >what the throwers (e.g., Michael Kay) prefer. I agree that a QNAME >datatype is a mistake, because it's useless without context. Cool. Could you explain this piece a bit more? I'm not sure what you were suggesting: > Element names don't matter but it can have multiple xmlns:type > attributes that have URI(s) describing the element? ------------- Simon St.Laurent - SSL is my TLA http://simonstl.com may be my URI http://monasticxml.org may be my ascetic URI urn:oid:1.3.6.1.4.1.6320 is another possibility altogether
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|