[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Does WTSIWYG make simplicity moot? (was Re: dtds
Paul Prescod wrote: > Note that languages/systems that depend on IDEs have no evolutionary > staying power. [...] And every attempt to > make programming languages deeply visual has failed. Not so. The most illuminating thing for me was to have spent a couple of years as a multimedia developer, using Macromedia's Director. Its programming language, Lingo, is Turing-complete, blah blah blah, and you can use it to do everything in Director, but you don't have to. We had one guy with a Pascal background who did *everything* via Lingo, to the point where I think he reduced his productivity by doing so. We had other developers who were not programmers at all, not in their own minds, but they could use the visual metaphor to build completely fit-for-purpose multimedia applications. Sometimes one of the more hard core programming types might have to add some extra Lingo code as required, but that is OK. Director opens up development to a far larger group of people than most programming languages do, by lowering the level of entry. What makes Director different to more typical programming IDEs? Director has to appeal to both programmers & artists. It would be a failure in its target market if it didn't. By contrast, many technical specs never rise beyond an ASCII view of life and the universe. So it is a self-fulfilling prophecy that they sometimes seem best handled using the plainest text editor available. Cheers, Tony. ==== Anthony B. Coates, Information & Software Architect mailto:abcoates@T... MDDL Editor (Market Data Definition Language) http://www.mddl.org/
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|