[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
AndrewWatt2000@a... wrote: > > SVG is significantly ahead of where XUL and XForms are. At least for > the moment. After all XForms is only at CR. > > Sure, XUL and XForms may come along later.... > ... > > What do you need XHTML for that SVG doesn't pretty much already do? I don't know why you are in such a hurry to pit technologies that were designed to be complimentary against each other. It is _significantly_ easier to make web documents that resize properly across user agents in XHTML. Scaling is not always what you want. Sometimes you want constrain-based layout and XHTML has it and SVG does not. Sometimes you want forms widgets and XForms have them and SVG does not. Sometimes you want windows, menus, toolbars, etc. XUL has them. SVG does not. And sometimes you want vector graphics. SVG has them. The others do not. Paul Prescod
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|