[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Why RDF is hard

• To: "Shelley Powers" <shelleyp@b...>,"Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: Why RDF is hard
• From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 08:25:00 -0800
• Thread-index: AcKOn3fIWz1H2pTfSo6P5FoXs4O99ACEXuVk
• Thread-topic: Why RDF is hard

The last time I looked the W3C Technical Architecture Group was going to issue some direction on namespace documents and intended to recommend RDDL/RDF. This may not literally be "forcing" authorities that own XML namespaces to use RDF but it is a strong push and some would at least call it coercion. 

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: Shelley Powers [mailto:shelleyp@b...] 
	Sent: Sun 11/17/2002 5:11 PM 
	To: Simon St.Laurent; xml-dev@l... 
	Cc: 
	Subject: Re:  Why RDF is hard
	
	

	
	No one is forcing anyone to use RDF. This isn't a dismissal -- this
	was meant to be a reassurance.
	
	Shelley
	
	

• Prev by Date: RE: What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
• Next by Date: Re: HI
• Previous by thread: HI
• Next by thread: RE: Why RDF is hard
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread