[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Why RDF is hard
I've said RDF is simple, it's basically just [node] ---arc---> [node] or in N-triples form: subject predicate object . for example, note that nodes are named by URIrefs, stuff inside <..> is a URIref, and QNames are converted to URIrefs: <http://example.org/foo#XSD> rddl:purpose <http://www.rddl.org/purposes#schema-validation> . <http://example.org/foo#XSD> rddl:related <http://www.example.org/foo.xsd> . but RDF gets hard fast. That's because the problems that RDF can be used to solve might be very tricky problems. It's not that RDF *itself* is so complicated, it's that its problem domain (e.g. unstructured databases or "knowledge representation") is complicated. This might be a good explanation: http://slashdot.org/~Jack%20William%20Bell/journal/16717 Jonathan http://www.jonathanborden-md.com http://www.erieneurosurgery.com http://www.openhealth.org
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|