[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: RDDL/RDF - no RDF tax?
Henry S. Thompson wrote: > Does this mean that RDDL2 documents are _not_ XHTML? This seems a > backward step to me -- one of the things I _really_ like about RDDL is > that when you point a browser at a namespace name which points to an > RDDL doc, something sensible happens. Most certainly not. http://www.rddl.org/RDDL2 proposes XHTML+RDF formats (its just a proposal and not yet in final form). I've also shown http://www.rddl.org/RDDL2-example.html which is an RDF/XML document (not XHTML despite its extension) that *does* display in a browser -- I doubt that we'd pick this (pure RDF/XML) format for RDDL2, instead go with a XHTML + RDF hybrid. > Jonathan http://www.jonathanborden-md.com http://www.erieneurosurgery.com http://www.openhealth.org
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|