[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: more QName madness
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 09:28:49AM -0500, John Cowan wrote: > Paul Prescod scripsit: > > > I home I'm missing something: if I have ten XPointers in a document and > > they each use 3 namespaces, do I necessarily have 30 xmlns declarations? > > No, you have 3 uses of the xmlns() scheme in each of your ten XPointers. > The xmlns declarations in the embedding document are irrelevant; after all, > that document need not be XML at all: it could be plain text, HTML, PDF, or > hard copy. You clearly need the xmlns() scheme for those case where the context cannot provide the namespace binding. However when the reference is done from an XML document, the option of inheriting the binding from the context (like for XPath uses in XSLT) could have been allowed, avoiding that redundancy. But it's not related to the new scheme namespacing mechanism that Simon was pointing out, the absence of inheritance has been there for years (well nearly 2 years). Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/ veillard@r... | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|