[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: equivalentTo vs. XSLT
Miles Sabin wrote: >... > Not quite. I'm saying that vocabulary to vocabulary mappings can be > expressed in XSLT as well as in OWL, and I'm suggesting that for many > practical purposes XSLT is likely to be a better bet. I don't think that anybody is claiming that OWL should replace XSLT. Rather that OWL is better when OWL's features are a better fit and XSLT is better in the opposite situation. We've talked at length about the strengths and weaknesses of both already. Paul Prescod
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|