[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: XML/RDF

• To: Miles Sabin <miles@m...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: XML/RDF
• From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2002 19:36:24 -0800
• References: <BD2DBD26EE0BAA48B1A425C7BE7923002CFF9F@c...> <3DCEBCBF.6090503@p...> <200211102037.12966.miles@m...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826

Miles Sabin wrote:
> ...
> 
> I prefer the other option too.
> 
> But it's not clear to me what this has to do with RDF or DAML. Once 
> you've defined a mapping between the vocabularies (and if you want to 
> get fancy, between the choreographies too), and what useful job is 
> there left for assertions and reasoners to do?

I would define the mapping _as_ a RDF/DAML(OWL) assertion using DAML's 
(OWL's) equivalentTo relationship.

  Paul Prescod

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML/RDF
    • From: Miles Sabin <miles@m...>

• References:
  • RE: XML/RDF
    • From: Micah Dubinko <MDubinko@c...>
  • Re: XML/RDF
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
  • Re: XML/RDF
    • From: Miles Sabin <miles@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML/RDF
• Next by Date: Sauterne was: Re: XML/RDF
• Previous by thread: Re: XML/RDF
• Next by thread: Re: XML/RDF
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread