[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: canonical xml
Rich Salz wrote: > UDDI/XSD-C14N will probably be as succesful as the rest of UDDI I'm not sure that XSD-C14N (usually known as SCC14N) will be that tied to UDDI. It is rather useful whenever one needs some form of C14N (usually for security reasons) when writing out PSVI data. For instance an attribute of type xs:float which has a lexical value of "1.0" in the original document might not round-trip to "1.0", therefore it's useful to know whether or not there has been a loss in the middle, or if "0.99...6" is ok. -- Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...> Research Engineer, Expway 7FC0 6F5F D864 EFB8 08CE 8E74 58E6 D5DB 4889 2488
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|