[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: RDF : Headless Triples syntax
Danny Ayers scripsit: > I can understand the need for an <rdf:RDF> wall around embedded RDF in the > current syntax (to keep its Gothic structure out of sight). If however the > RDF was restricted to (decapitated) one-layer statements, I reckon an > <rdf:D> ha-ha is adequate. Actually, rdf:RDF isn't required, and Reuters Health doesn't use it. -- John Cowan <jcowan@r...> http://www.reutershealth.com http://www.ccil.org/~cowan .e'osai ko sarji la lojban. Please support Lojban! http://www.lojban.org
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|