[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: more QName madness
> >Sadly, my prediction that no-one would ever use XML Namespaces because > >the whole idea was so unworkable is one of many occasions on which I I don't think I understand what the alternative is. Is it this? Element names don't matter but it can have multiple xmlns:type attributes that have URI(s) describing the element? If that's it, why is that better? Aliasing? If that's not it, what is it? /r$
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|