[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: What is XHTML 2.0 for?
There is a chicken and egg problem. Until someone builds that "universal, XML-native, SVG/XForms/etc.-aware browser platform" and proves **performance**, implementability, ease of applicability, authorability, usability and so on, then puts it in enough development environments, the small but smart dedicated clients have the road. The tools to build these are already on the desktops and in the developer's toolkits. I'm not sure what marginalization means in this context. The compelling argument against the smart small clients is not that they do anything harmful to the web but that they require installation and setup. N-tier thin clients can be delivered via an email message as long as everything they need to hook up on the server is already there. len -----Original Message----- From: Mike Champion [mailto:mc@x...] Hmmm ... There may not be an urgent need for the details of XHTML 2.0, but there is a VERY urgent need to promote the vision of the universal, XML-native, SVG/XForms/etc.-aware browser platform to counter the trends back to proprietary fat client systems that some seem willing to accept. I agree with Len (I think) that these are good options for industrial-strength vendors to have, but they can't be allowed to marginalize the Web as it is and could be. Of course, the challenge is more to get implementations of what there is than to standardize all the innovations coming from the browser developers, but there still needs to be a strong XHTML activity to center this on.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|