[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XML/RDF
Simon St.Laurent scripsit: > "Eschew mixed content" seemed the most ridiculous (and memorable) at the > time, and I'd been having particular annoyances with general failures to > appreciate mixed content at that point. (Both W3C XML Schema and RELAX > NG seem to treat it as a special case rather than as something quite > normal, though RELAX NG is less extreme in that.) RNG treats text as a special case? In what sense? > Looking at the whole project in more detail and with examples, I find > the whole thing repulsive, at least when taken as an approach to > creating XML generally. On the other hand, as a human-readable syntax > for RDF, it's far better than anything else I've seen. It's always been acceptable RDF. -- John Cowan jcowan@r... www.ccil.org/~cowan www.reutershealth.com "In the sciences, we are now uniquely privileged to sit side by side with the giants on whose shoulders we stand." --Gerald Holton
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|