[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: RDF and the new releases
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 10:52:02PM -0800, Ken North wrote: > As for RDF being unreadable or incomprehensible, Jonathan Borden's > always said you can do a presentation about RDF using one slide. Could be. On the other hand, I've seen people--smart developers who have little trouble grasping, for example, XSLT, struggle to get their heads around RDF. But I have a hypothesis as to why this is so. As Simon St.Laurent wrote: > There's a serious divide between the two approaches. I'm very impressed > by some of the people who do regularly cross between XML and RDF and > that they can keep their heads straight as they do so. Yes, and I think the RDF model is not at all hard to understand: ignoring the standard terminology, it's all about objects with named properties. What could be simpler? But the XML syntax seems to obscure the simplicity of the model. I believe the source of the confusion is that people expect the structure of an XML-RDF document to reflect the structure of the underlying graph ... but very often it doesn't. -- Matt Gushee When a nation follows the Way, Englewood, Colorado, USA Horses bear manure through mgushee@h... its fields; http://www.havenrock.com/ When a nation ignores the Way, Horses bear soldiers through its streets. --Lao Tzu (Peter Merel, trans.)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|