[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: XHTML and OpenOffice
> -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Prescod [mailto:paul@p...] >> True enough. I'm starting to wonder about the pile-up of standards > around editable, flowable documents. > > * there is XHTML > * there is XSL-FO > * there is a new Open Office project which will surely define a new > word processor format > * SVG now has textflow features > > The XHTML working group _could_ take it upon themselves to attack this > particular problem. <giggle /><snort /><guffaw /> I can just imagine the cacophony that would erupt. People have coronaries when we talk about small adjustments to linking semantics, and you want us to tackle THAT? The HTML WG, for lack of service elsewhere, HAS taken a "leadership role" as others have suggested in quite a number of areas. When people figure out that's what has happened, hysteria happens, and 18 months later the bulk of what we suggested gets implemented, under the guise of someone else dreaming it up. Ann
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|