[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: What are the arguments *for* XHTML 2.0?
Probably one should note that most of the people working on the XHTML projects and other WGs are volunteers. Either they or their companies are paying for their time and contributions. My guess is that other than review and approval, the W3C is mainly fulfilling administrative functions. So as long as there is member interest expressed by the sign up sheet and fulfillment of assignments, there is no scarcity of resources in this case. ... now about that hot tub. It is where? Near the pub? len From: Paul Prescod [mailto:paul@p...] AndrewWatt2000@a... wrote: > That tends to support my viewpoint that it is not axiomatic that further > development of XHTML is a wise use of limited W3C resources. What resources in particular are you concerned about? If the editors of XHTML 2.0 were not working on XHTML 2.0, they might spend their time at the pub or in the hot-tub. That wouldn't advance the Web.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|