[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: canonical xml

• To: ricko@a... (Rick Jelliffe)
• Subject: Re: canonical xml
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 07:05:18 -0500 (EST)
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <022901c29126$d5e8e530$4bc8a8c0@A...> from "Rick Jelliffe" at Nov 21, 2002 05:25:50 PM

Rick Jelliffe scripsit:

> Canonical XML is not the only canonical XML, just as 
> XML Schemas are not the only XML schemas, and the XML Infoset is not the only
> XML infoset. 

To which we can add that Word is not the only word processor, and
Microsoft Money is, thank Mung, not yet the only kind of money.

-- 
John Cowan      http://www.ccil.org/~cowan      jcowan@r...
Be yourself.  Especially do not feign a working knowledge of RDF where
no such knowledge exists.  Neither be cynical about RELAX NG; for in
the face of all aridity and disenchantment in the world of markup,
James Clark is as perennial as the grass.  --DeXiderata, Sean McGrath

• References:
  • Re: canonical xml
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Ode to the Sem-Web
• Next by Date: Re: canonical xml
• Previous by thread: Re: canonical xml
• Next by thread: Re: canonical xml
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread