[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: JITTs and DOM

• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: JITTs and DOM
• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
• Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 12:34:02 -0400
• In-reply-to: <004c01c27139$f906c440$9e539696@citkwaclaww2k>
• Organization: Red Bridge Interactive, Inc.
• References: <200210101305.JAA29379@m...> <175108945785.20021011161543@j...> <004c01c27139$f906c440$9e539696@citkwaclaww2k>
• Reply-to: gtn@r...

On Friday 11 October 2002 11:22 am, Karl Waclawek wrote:
> > > As I noted, the speedup is most likely because the cost of building
> > > a DOM is usually in object construction, rather than in parsing.
> >
> > Ahh, I see. Yes, I take it back, Patrick's observations *are* an
> > effective demonstration that building smaller DOMs takes substantially
> > less time than building larger DOMs from the same source document and
> > therefore that pre-processing to remove (or turn into text nodes) data
> > that you're not interested in is a good tactic.
>
> I am wondering why there is no API combining Push or Pull with DOM.
> Most DOM parsers have an underlying event parser anyway.

You could use a SAX filter if the DOM builder can take SAX as input.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: JITTs and DOM
    • From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@w...>

• References:
  • Re: JITTs and DOM
    • From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@j...>
  • Re: JITTs and DOM
    • From: "Karl Waclawek" <karl@w...>

• Prev by Date: Re: The Knights of Tag Soup (was Re: RE: evolvable formats )
• Next by Date: Re: JITTs and DOM
• Previous by thread: Re: JITTs and DOM
• Next by thread: Re: JITTs and DOM
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread