[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] OT: Save me from typing (was: XML as "passive data")
> And since this can be done in C++ too, the question now is: > Which languages (except C and Java) do *not* support the feature > described above (often called "properties")? What I object to (no pun intended) is having to write all those stinkin' set/get methods. Why can't I just write: private, public int foo; // private data member, public accessors which will (tacitly) generate: int getFoo() { return foo;} void setFoo( int Foo ) { foo = Foo;} with appropriate calls to super.get/set methods in cases of derived classes. Then, if I have too, I can override tacit methods by explicitely writing method bodies. Okay, Alaric: which language already does this? A hybrid approach such as XML Schema + Castor is one (imperfect) approach that's not going to win any popularity contests on this list.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|