[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: SGML on the Web


Re:  SGML on the Web
David Carlisle writes:
> Much as it pains me to support Microsoft I'd take exactly the oposite
> view here. I'd say that XML-on-the-web is distinctly uninteresting
> without a transformation language. My XML _never_ looks just like the
> presentation (for simple documents where that could be the case I'd
> just use (x)html anyway).

That's very odd to me, as about 97% of the XML I work with (including
the data) can be viewed usefully in a browser with just CSS -
display:table being particularly useful, but hardly the only case.

The only cases where I have a genuine problem involve some of my grosser
stupidities with putting content into attribute, a habit I got into
while writing SAX filters that I'm now trying to break.

On the Web, I think it's fair to say that most Web developers are quite
familiar with the case where document order is presentation order.

> So you require client side XSLT, until relatively recently that has
> only really worked in IE so in fact IE is a very capabable XML
> browser. Far from MicroSoft having a non-approach to XML in the
> browser, whether they like it or not they have a credible aproach. It
> could do with some tweaks, such as the default stylesheet doing
> something different with xhtml namespace but these are relatively
> minor issues.

Their handling of the XHTML namespace and mixtures of XML and XHTML is
execrable to put it mildly; I suppose that doesn't matter as much if you
plan to use XSLT to massage your data into something (HTML) their
browser actually can handle.

> The XSLT in mozilla and Netscape is now fortunately (at last) fairly
> robust (if not particularly fast) so we can finally put xml on the
> web with a reasonable chance that someone with a "new enough" browser
> can handle the thing. Of course not all browsers and platform are
> there yet but its early days: NS 7's only been out a couple of months
> or so in a full release, I still hope other systems will support this
> in the future.

And the CSS in Mozilla and Netscape (and to a lesser extent in Opera)
puts IE completely to shame for any XML application.

(Generally speaking, I think the Mozilla folks got it right as far as
integrating XML and HTML in the Web browser, though I'm fonder of
Opera's CSS-based linking than the simple XLink support in Mozilla.)
 
> As more clients become available I hope we will see more xslt styled
> xml on the web. Docbook for example...

I'm happy with CSS for pretty much all the direct DocBook reading I do
up to the point where ORA feeds it all into Frame.


-------------
Simon St.Laurent - SSL is my TLA
http://simonstl.com may be my URI
http://monasticxml.org may be my ascetic URI
urn:oid:1.3.6.1.4.1.6320 is another possibility altogether

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.