[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars!

• To: "xml-dev" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars!
• From: "Anthony B. Coates" <abcoates@T...>
• Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 12:08:16 +0100
• In-reply-to: <B885BEDCB3664E4AB1C72F1D85CB29F8040EF684@R...>
• References: <B885BEDCB3664E4AB1C72F1D85CB29F8040EF684@R...>
• Reply-to: "Anthony B. Coates" <abcoates@T...>

** Reply to message from "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...> on Mon, 21 Oct
2002 03:58:32 -0700

> This has little to do with the differences between relational and XML
> querying. All you've pointed out is that XML queries are typically done
> against a "view" while SQL queries are typically run against an actual
> database schema. A query against XML can be similarly tightly coupled if
> done against an XML repository (i.e. a native XML or XML-enabled DBMS)
> as can a SQL query be loosely coupled if performed against a SQL view. 

Sorry, I should have written "SQL/XQuery" instead of "SQL".  From the point of
view of the discussion, XQuery is as likely to be as tightly bound to physical
schemas as SQL.  I was talking more of declarative messaging-style XML queries
that do not implement a formal query language.

	Cheers,
		Tony.
====
Anthony B. Coates, Information & Software Architect
mailto:abcoates@T...
MDDL Editor (Market Data Definition Language)
http://www.mddl.org/

• References:
  • RE: The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars!
    • From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars!
• Next by Date: RE: Java package for XPath 1.0
• Previous by thread: RE: The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars!
• Next by thread: Re: The Browser Wars are Dead! Long Live the Browser Wars!
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread