[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Do We Need James Clark to get Good Recs?
Thomas B. Passin wrote: > Sometimes it seems to me that most of the XML-related Recs/Specs that > xml-dev'ers approve of are those that James Clark had a major influence on. > Sax is an exception, I suppose, but that had David M. playing a unifying > role, so maybe it is in a similar category. James Clark was involved with XML before it was a key technology for every big company in the world. The politics were secondary to the technology back then. Someone _like_ James Clark is a necessary but not sufficient condition to producing a great spec. The other half is that he and his co-workers need to be freed to work without constant pressure to add features before V1 ships. Paul Prescod
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|