[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: The XML 1.1 Candidate Recommendation is published
Karl Waclawek scripsit: > If Unicode allows strings to have different spellings, than this is a generic > problem for all applications processing Unicode strings. So why add the extra > complexity to an XML processor to check for normalization, so that an application > that would normally treat Unicode strings in a standard way suddenly can do it > differently, because the XML processor already takes care of part of it? It isn't really enough to take an XML document and just check normalization as if it were a plain-text Unicode document. The various strings in XML documents -- names, runs of character content, attribute values, etc. need each to be checked separately. -- Evolutionary psychology is the theory John Cowan that men are nothing but horn-dogs, http://www.ccil.org/~cowan and that women only want them for their money. http://www.reutershealth.com --Susan McCarthy (adapted) jcowan@r...
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|