[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XPath/XSLT 2.0 concerns
Eric van der Vlist wrote: > On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 06:00, Mike Champion wrote: >>The basic reason is that the DOM abstract schemas thingie really didn't >>meet anyone's requirements. > > Yes, that's probably the reason even though I was starting to think that > it could meet a -specific yet non null- need. I concur. The company I work with does binary XML encoding based on XML Schema. There is no reason for us to be restricted to XML Schema and we'd be quite happy offering the same service for any schema language, however given the current situation it's not worth putting in the effort to support something else. DOM AS could have helped sufficiently that we'd be offering the same service for any schema language it supported more easily (based on what I remember from reading the draft a while ago). I agree that it's a marginal use case (there can only be so many companies providing binary XML solutions), but it's non-null. -- Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@e...> Research Engineer, Expway 7FC0 6F5F D864 EFB8 08CE 8E74 58E6 D5DB 4889 2488
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|