[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Profundity du jour (was Re: What is XML For?)

• To: AndrewWatt2000@a...
• Subject: Re: Profundity du jour (was Re: What is XML For?)
• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 11:57:37 -0400 (EDT)
• Cc: jcowan@r..., xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <138.1688458f.2ae967cf@a...> from "AndrewWatt2000@a..." at Oct 24, 2002 11:12:15 AM

AndrewWatt2000@a... scripsit:

> Do you consider that assertion remains credible in a post-hanging-chad world?

Sure.  Bush II will end up next to Rutherford Hayes in the history books
a century hence.  (Unless he does something *really* stupid.)

-- 
First known example of political correctness:   John Cowan
"After Nurhachi had united all the other        http://www.reutershealth.com
Jurchen tribes under the leadership of the      http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Manchus, his successor Abahai (1592-1643)       jcowan@r...
issued an order that the name Jurchen should       --S. Robert Ramsey,
be banned, and from then on, they were all         _The Languages of China_
to be called Manchus."

• References:
  • Re: Profundity du jour (was Re: What is XML For?)
    • From: AndrewWatt2000@a...

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: W3C and Linking - what is the future?
• Next by Date: Re: DOM Level 3, more or less flexible than AS?
• Previous by thread: Re: Profundity du jour (was Re: What is XML For?)
• Next by thread: W3C and Linking - what is the future?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread