[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] XML 1.1 and other specs
Just wondering (again) the consequences of XML 1.1 on other specs. The end-of-line stuff is done by the parser, will not be seen by the applications and shouldn't have a uge impact on the other specs... The modification of the defininition of a Name will create an incoherence between XML 1.1 and specs such as XSLT, XPath, CSS, W3C XML Schema part 2 or RDF (there are probably more of these which are just the ones I am using on a daily basis!): a XML 1.1 name won't be any longer a name for these specs. Is there any plan to ask (or kindly suggest) to these working groups to publish new releases of their specs? If not, wouldn't people using the relaxed definition of names create documents on which an XPath expression or a CSS selector can't be writen or can't be used in a RDF document? Probably less an issue except for applications dealing with documentation of vocabularies, but these names won't be validated by a xs:Name type. Isn't there a risk to make these names "second class names" considered as bad practice? Thanks Eric -- Freelance consulting and training. http://dyomedea.com/english/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com (W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema ------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|